Australian Medical Professionals Society (AMPS) alongside AusExitsWHO and human rights lawyers that formed our Delegation to Canberra have sent letters to the AG & AHRC. This correspondence will be supported by other Senators and MP's that have been made aware of our message. Read the letters here.
Many people, after having sent emails to MP's, received 'standard type' replies which fail to address the gravity of the situation that has been brought to their attention. Here are two documents with suggested responses for download:
The deadline (January 27, 2024) to submit proposed amendments has passed. It is the responsibility of every sovereign member nation of the WHO to defend the rule of law and enforce Article 55.
On Friday, Bret Weinstein warned of impending tyranny from the World Health Organization. “We are in the middle of a coup,” the evolutionary biologist and podcaster told Tucker Carlson on X. The WHO’s new pandemic management regime will eliminate sovereignty, Weinstein said, and allow it to override national constitutions.
The World Council for Health (WCH) works with different expert groups in the development of policy briefs to present research and recommendations to specialized and non-specialized audiences on a variety of essential issues. These documents serve to provide evidence-based policy advice to help readers make informed decisions.
The standing director-general of the World Health Organization is a man named Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. Tedros, as he is frequently called, was elected to the position of director-general on May 23, 2017, becoming the first WHO director-general in history to not be a medical doctor. Instead of having been a medical doctor, Tedros served ministerial positions for Ethiopia under the regime of the Tigray Peoples’ Liberation Front (TPLF), a prolifically violent Marxist organization of which he was a prominent member of the politburo.
The alarming Proposed Amendments to the International Health Regulations being spearheaded by Sir Ashley Bloomfiled and the new Proposed Pandemic Treaty and what they will mean for YOU!
I was had. I thought the WHO was the bad guy. Turns out I need to look closer to home. Shout out to James Roguski for helping me realise!
This detailed research document underpinning the case is authored by The Peoples Lawyers. You can find out more about their case here. I am publishing the document here in full to inform lawyers in other countries wishing to take a similar actions. I will publish a summary in due course.
Senator Ralph Babet is one of few parliamentarians who actually understand the extent to which these changes will tie us to following the WHO’s lead in the next pandemic
The Director General (DG) of the World Health Organization (WHO) states:
No country will cede any sovereignty to WHO, referring to the WHO’s new pandemic agreement and proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR), currently being negotiated. His statements are clear and unequivocal, and wholly inconsistent with the texts he is referring to.
Global activism against the World Health Organization’s (WHO) proposed pandemic treaty and amendments to its International Health Regulations (IHR) is intensifying ahead of the Dec. 1 deadline to reject the proposed 2022 IHR amendments. Critics say the proposals boost WHO’s authority, erode national sovereignty and threaten health freedom.
For most Australians, any distant international bureaucracy seems a world away from their everyday lives. When discussing the WHO (World Health Organisation), we have discovered the need to use their full title to avoid confusion with the English rock band of that name…
Australians have until 11.59pm Sunday 24 September 2023 to voice our objections to proposed changes to international law which would see the introduction of a new “pandemic instrument” (commonly referred to as a “pandemic treaty”) as well as changes to existing International Health Regulations. (It seems the deadline has quietly been extended by a week!)
This report is designed to help readers think about some big topics: how to really prevent pandemics and biological warfare, how to assess proposals by the WHO and its members for preventing and responding to pandemics, and whether we can rely on our health officials to navigate these areas in ways that make sense and will help their populations.
After what we have all be through over the last three and a half years, I am reluctant to burden my readers with news that is of cataclysmic proportions…..but I have no choice. This is not hyperbole…..this is FACT.
In 2022, the World Health Organization spent twice as much money on salaries ($1.164 billion) as they did on medical supplies and materials ($551 million).
As requested, we have outlined the central points of this important 45-page Policy Brief in a 7-page document for your convenience.
The director-general of the World Health Organization (WHO) reassures us that the WHO’s “pandemic accord” (or “treaty”) won’t reduce the sovereignty of its Member States. The WHO trusts that these words will serve as a distraction from reality.
Analysts warn that the ratification of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) pandemic treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations could strip away sovereignty from nation-states and place public health decision-making power in the hands of the WHO and its director-general.
THE World Health Organisation (WHO) is proposing the adoption of a ‘Pandemic Treaty’, or ‘Pandemic Accord’ as it is now being called
As you are no doubt aware, the global elite are making moves to have people “own nothing and be happy.”
The World Health Organization is emerging from the peak of the pandemic bruised. Its member states must get back to prioritizing universal health care.
If the World Health Organization’s treaty is widely ratified, the evil twins of Technocracy and Transhumanism will have triumphed over global health, and hence, over humanity.
The WHO is the globalists’ conduit to impose their wicked agendas upon us. They are moving fast and in secrecy to enslave the entire population of the world. We must be vigilant and actively fight them now.
Why proposed changes to the International Health Regulations are a VERY BAD idea
GENEVA, Sept 28 (Reuters) - More than 80 aid workers including some employed by the World Health Organization (WHO) were involved in sexual abuse and exploitation during an Ebola crisis in the Democratic Republic of Congo, an independent commission said on Tuesday.
James Roguski is a powerhouse of information when it comes to the proposed amendments to the IHR and he runs two *daily* zoom calls that anyone is welcome to join.
Join his calls here: https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/daily-zoom-meetings
Read his Substack: https://jamesroguski.substack.com/
Anne Gibbons Substack: https://substack.com/profile/12468130-anne-gibbons