We've put together some 'Fact-packs' which we hope will help people on two fronts:
These are questions for you to take to your representatives:
AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL HEALTH REGULATIONS (IHR)
Q1: Are you aware of the proposed amendments to the International Health regulations?
The proposed amendments would:
W.H.O. FACTS
Q2: Considering this information, do you support the proposed amendments to the International Health regulations, which would give unprecedented global power to the W.H.O.?
Q3: If you do not support these amendments, will you support action to remove Australia from the W.H.O., given that if passed these amendments will become legally binding, irrespective of how Australia votes?
The only answer for Australian leaders that wish to be seen by voters as part of the solution, not hellbent on extending licence given to those who have already harmed us is to EXIT THE WHO.
AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL HEALTH REGULATIONS (IHR)
Proposed Amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) (2005) submitted in accordance with decision WHA75(9) (2022): https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr1/WGIHR_Compilation-en.pdf
The proposed amendments would:
Other major concerns presented by the IHR Amendments include UNSPECIFIED, POTENTIALLY ENORMOUS FINANCIAL COSTS (Article 44A); ALLOCATION PLAN (Article 13A); OBLIGATIONS OF DUTY TO COOPERATE (Annex 10).
BACKGROUND ON THE W.H.O.:
W.H.O. COVID-19 RESPONSE
W.H.O. FUNDING
W.H.O. LEADERSHIP
In January 2022, Ethiopia’s foreign ministry called on the WHO to investigate its leader for supporting rebellious forces fighting the Ethiopian government. In October 2022, Ethiopia withheld its support and 28 other countries appointed Tedros for a second five-year term as W.H.O. Director General. https://www.euronews.com/2022/01/15/us-ethiopia-conflict-who
ONE HEALTH
‘Recognition of a One Health approach connects the health of humans, animals and our planet’. Once we couple the term ‘One Health’ with the phrase ‘Whole/All of society’, it is arguable they have created a scope of action that has no discernible boundaries.
‘A whole-of-society approach goes beyond institutions; it influences and mobilises local and global culture and media, rural and urban communities and all relevant policy sectors, such as the education system, the transport sector, the environment and even urban design.’ https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/346033/WHO-EURO-2019-3475-43234-60595-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
The Australian voting public, most already reeling from inflation and the Covid-19 response, will not accept a Government planning to hand our sovereignty, and many of our basic freedoms, to an unelected international authority. Especially one whose second biggest contributor also profited billions from the GMO/mRNA therapies many were forced to take, with coercion and without informed consent. The truth, being exposed daily, will need some direct, honest answers.
Expanding the powers of the WHO is guaranteeing continuation of the crisis.
Surely the $US98 million Australia’s WHO commitment cost Australia 2020-21 could be better spent on frontline healthcare at home?
The only answer for Australian leaders that wish to be seen by voters as part of the solution, not hellbent on extending licence given to those who have already harmed us is to EXIT THE WHO.
For more information please go to the Australia Exits the W.H.O website: https://australiaexitsthewho.com/