Fact-Packs

These are questions for you to take to your representatives:

AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL HEALTH REGULATIONS (IHR)

Q1: Are you aware of the proposed amendments to the International Health regulations?

The proposed amendments would:

1. CHANGE THE NATURE OF THE W.H.O. (World Health Organization) FROM ADVISORY TO MANDATORY: Australia would lose its ability to act autonomously.
2. CAUSE LOSS OF SOVEREIGNTY: Australian sovereignty would be ceded to the unelected WHO.
3. DISREGARD DIGNITY, HUMAN RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS: Even the WHO’s own working party has rejected this clause, but there is no decision on their recommendations. What reasonable body acting FOR the people would remove “human rights and fundamental freedoms”?
4. ENABLE ACTION ON POTENTIAL RATHER THAN ACTUAL EMERGENCIES:  The unelected Regional Director of the WHO could act on suspicion of a potential issue, with no proof required.
5. ENFORCE MANDATORY MEDICAL TREATMENTS: Removes bodily autonomy for the entire population, including our children.
6. ENFORCE GLOBAL HEALTH CERTIFICATES: This would give an international, unelected Director General full control and oversight of the world populations location, travel plans and medical information. An obvious national security risk of huge proportions.
7. ENFORCE SURVEILENCE OF PEOPLE AND THEIR INTERACTION WITH ALL MEDIA: Mass surveillance systems have already been developed within Australia enabling tracking of movements and information transfer, which is a violation of free speech.

W.H.O. FACTS

• The W.H.O. Covid-19 response was wrong, every step of the way.
• The International result of The WHO being wrong every step of the way is EXCESS DEATHS.
• The W.H.O. is an unelected, majority private-funded body. Their second highest contributor is the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, by any measure a grave and unacceptable conflict of interest.
• WHO Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus is a member of the terrorist declared TPLF. The Ethiopian Government did not support his nomination to this position.
• A One Health approach connects the health of humans, animals and our planet’. ‘One Health’ coupled with the phrase ‘Whole/All of society’ creates action that has no discernible boundaries.

Q2: Considering this information, do you support the proposed amendments to the International Health regulations, which would give unprecedented global power to the W.H.O.?

Q3: If you do not support these amendments, will you support action to remove Australia from the W.H.O., given that if passed these amendments will become legally binding, irrespective of how Australia votes?

The only answer for Australian leaders that wish to be seen by voters as part of the solution, not hellbent on extending licence given to those who have already harmed us is to EXIT THE WHO.

AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL HEALTH REGULATIONS (IHR)

Proposed Amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) (2005) submitted in accordance with decision WHA75(9) (2022): https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr1/WGIHR_Compilation-en.pdf

The proposed amendments would:

1. CHANGE THE NATURE OF THE W.H.O. (World Health Organization) FROM ADVISORY TO MANDATORY: change from an advisory to a governing body whose proclamations would be legally-binding. (Article 1 and Article 42)
2. CAUSE LOSS OF SOVEREIGNTY: Would empower the Emergency Committee to override decisions made by sovereign nations and would make the Emergency Committee’s decisions final. (Article 43)
3. DISREGARD DIGNITY, HUMAN RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS: Seek to remove “respect for dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of people.” (Article 3)
4. ENABLE ACTION ON POTENTIAL RATHER THAN ACTUAL EMERGENCIES: Greatly expand the scope of the IHR to include scenarios that have “potential to impact public health.” (Article 2)
5. ENFORCE MANDATORY MEDICAL TREATMENTS: Give the W.H.O. authority to require medical examinations, proof of prophylaxis, proof of vaccination and to implement contact tracing, quarantine and TREATMENT. (Article 18)
6. ENFORCE GLOBAL HEALTH CERTIFICATES: Institute a system of global health certificates in digital (or paper format), including test certificates, vaccine certificates, prophylaxis certificates, recovery certificates, passenger locator forms and a traveller’s health declaration. (Articles 18, 23, 24, 27, 28, 31, 35, 36 and 44 and Annexes 6 and 8)
7. ENFORCE SURVEILENCE OF PEOPLE AND THEIR INTERACTION WITH ALL MEDIA: This includes monitoring and tracking of human movement and their interaction of all media; “Documents containing information concerning traveler’s destination should preferably be produced in digital form, with paper form as a residual option”. When it comes to the people’s individual transfer of media; “At the Global level, W.H.O. Shall strengthen capacities to counter misinformation and disinformation” (Annex 1, page 36).

Other major concerns presented by the IHR Amendments include UNSPECIFIED, POTENTIALLY ENORMOUS FINANCIAL COSTS (Article 44A); ALLOCATION PLAN (Article 13A); OBLIGATIONS OF DUTY TO COOPERATE (Annex 10).
BACKGROUND ON THE W.H.O.:

W.H.O. COVID-19 RESPONSE

• Was wrong, every step of the way from:
  • the origins of the virus;
  • to hyperinflated modelling of deaths;
  • to anti common-sense health recommendations (Vitamin D, Vitamin C);
  • to the recommendation of masks, lockdowns and other - by their own preparedness plan https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/329438/9789241516839-eng.pdf - non-evidence based, but society destroying measures;
  • to the denigration of well tested, safe medications proven successful at preventing Covid-19 death and injury;
  • to the wholesale support of an untested, experimental novel GMO/mRNA therapy to be deployed to entire populations – despite the lack of any data on safety, full pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, genotoxicity, reproductive toxicity, and carcinogenicity.
• The International result of The W.H.O. being wrong every step of the way is EXCESS DEATHS.
  • March 2023: the Australian Bureau of Statistics published the latest data on excess deaths. There were 174,717 deaths in Australia up to 30 November in 2022, a record 22,886 more than the historical average, an increase of over 15 per cent. It’s the biggest numerical increase in deaths since the pandemic of 1919.
  • The problem is the same in other highly vaccinated countries. January 2023 was Japan’s worst month ever for Covid deaths. In Germany, excess mortality ranged between 10 per cent and 30 per cent in 2022 and shot up to 47 per cent in December 2022.
  • UK: Excess deaths in 2022 among worst in 50 years: https://www.bbc.com/news/health-64209221; OECD: Mortality (by week = 2023): Excess deaths by week, 2020-2023

W.H.O. FUNDING

• The WHO is an unelected, majority private-funded body. The WHO’s funding model establishes that it does the bidding of its contributors. The second highest contributor is not a country, it is the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, by any measure a grave and unacceptable conflict of interest. Any body beholden to corporate interests must not be given the power to override national constitutions and violate fundamental human rights. https://www.who.int/about/funding/contributors

W.H.O. LEADERSHIP

• W.H.O. Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus is a member of the terrorist declared Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF).

In January 2022, Ethiopia’s foreign ministry called on the WHO to investigate its leader for supporting rebellious forces fighting the Ethiopian government. In October 2022, Ethiopia withheld its support and 28 other countries appointed Tedros for a second five-year term as W.H.O. Director General. https://www.euronews.com/2022/01/15/us-ethiopia-conflict-who

• Despite stating that is was his “top priority to ensure that the perpetrators are not excused but are held to account” after 80 aid workers, including at least 21 W.H.O. employees took part in Congo sex abuse during Ebola crisis https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/who-heartbroken-by-congo-sex-abuse-probe-findings-2021-09-28/. The UN (The WHO is a UN Agency) investigation found no misconduct https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/un-found-no-managerial-misconduct-who-congo-sex-scandal-2023-01-31/

ONE HEALTH

• The ‘One Health’ concept has been redefined, expanded and developed by the WHO via its newly established subgroup, the One Health High-Level Expert Panel (OHHLEP).

‘Recognition of a One Health approach connects the health of humans, animals and our planet’. Once we couple the term ‘One Health’ with the phrase ‘Whole/All of society’, it is arguable they have created a scope of action that has no discernible boundaries.

‘A whole-of-society approach goes beyond institutions; it influences and mobilises local and global culture and media, rural and urban communities and all relevant policy sectors, such as the education system, the transport sector, the environment and even urban design.’ https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/346033/WHO-EURO-2019-3475-43234-60595-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

The Australian voting public, most already reeling from inflation and the Covid-19 response, will not accept a Government planning to hand our sovereignty, and many of our basic freedoms, to an unelected international authority. Especially one whose second biggest contributor also profited billions from the GMO/mRNA therapies many were forced to take, with coercion and without informed consent. The truth, being exposed daily, will need some direct, honest answers.

Expanding the powers of the WHO is guaranteeing continuation of the crisis.

Surely the $US98 million Australia’s WHO commitment cost Australia 2020-21 could be better spent on frontline healthcare at home?

The only answer for Australian leaders that wish to be seen by voters as part of the solution, not hellbent on extending licence given to those who have already harmed us is to EXIT THE WHO.

For more information please go to the Australia Exits the W.H.O website: https://australiaexitsthewho.com/